{"id":416,"date":"2012-05-15T21:12:25","date_gmt":"2012-05-15T19:12:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/opistobranquis.info\/diaphorodoris-luteocinctadiaphorodoris-luteocinctadiaphorodoris-luteocincta"},"modified":"2026-07-15T11:15:07","modified_gmt":"2026-07-15T09:15:07","slug":"diaphorodoris-luteocincta","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/opistobranquis.info\/en\/guia\/nudibranchia\/doridina\/doridoidei\/onchidoridoidea\/diaphorodoris-luteocincta\/","title":{"rendered":"Diaphorodoris luteocincta"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

Diaphorodoris luteocincta <\/em>(Sars, M.,1870)<\/h3>\n

\"Diaphorodoris<\/div>
Diaphorodoris luteocincta @ Matar\u00f3, Barcelona, Spain 6-05-2016<\/em> by Enric Madrenas<\/center><\/span>

<\/p>

WoRMS Taxonomic Information<\/h3>
Current accepted name: Diaphorodoris luteocincta<\/em> (M. Sars, 1870)<\/strong><\/div>

Current classification<\/h4>
Superdomain<\/th>Biota<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
Kingdom<\/th>Animalia<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
Phylum<\/th>Mollusca<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
Class<\/th>Gastropoda<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
Subclass<\/th>Heterobranchia<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
Infraclass<\/th>Euthyneura<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
Subterclass<\/th>Ringipleura<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
Superorder<\/th>Nudipleura<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
Order<\/th>Nudibranchia<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
Suborder<\/th>Doridina<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
Infraorder<\/th>Doridoidei<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
Superfamily<\/th>Onchidoridoidea<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
Family<\/th>Calycidorididae<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
Genus<\/th>Diaphorodoris<\/em><\/a><\/td><\/tr>
Species<\/th>Diaphorodoris luteocincta<\/em> (M. Sars, 1870)<\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/table>

Classification provided by the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS). [140630<\/a>]<\/p><\/div>Taxonomic note:<\/strong>\u00a0The systematic rank of the nudibranch Diaphorodoris luteocincta<\/em> has been debated for many decades. Many authors considered the subspecies D. luteocincta var. alba<\/em> and D. luteocincta var. reticulata<\/em> variations of the same species, however the recent morphological and molecular analyses performed by Furfaro et al. (2016) clearly deny this conclusion, demostrating that they are two different species:\u00a0D. alba<\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0D. luteocincta<\/em> respectively.<\/p>\n

Synonyms<\/strong><\/p>\n