Runcinida

Los Runcinida son un pequeño grupo de moluscos gasterópodos heterobranquios marinos tradicionalmente relacionados con las babosas marinas. Son animales de pequeño tamaño, con el cuerpo blando y sin una concha externa visible en el adulto. Su aspecto es discreto y su anatomía presenta diversas características especializadas que los diferencian de otros grupos de heterobranquios.

Runcina coronata por Luis Ángel Díaz Álvarez

Los Runcinida viven principalmente en ambientes marinos poco profundos, donde pueden encontrarse sobre sustratos rocosos, entre algas, bajo piedras o en otros hábitats bentónicos protegidos. Su pequeño tamaño y su comportamiento críptico hacen que sean difíciles de detectar durante los muestreos habituales. Se conocen de diferentes regiones marinas, pero su distribución real todavía puede estar poco documentada.

Una de sus características más distintivas es su cuerpo pequeño, alargado y generalmente aplanado, con una forma adaptada al desplazamiento sobre el sustrato. La cabeza presenta estructuras sensoriales, mientras que el pie permite al animal desplazarse por la superficie. Los adultos no presentan una concha externa desarrollada, aunque sus características anatómicas los sitúan dentro de los heterobranquios, con una historia evolutiva relacionada con formas con concha.

La biología de los Runcinida todavía es poco conocida. Son animales bentónicos y algunas especies están estrechamente asociadas a determinadas algas u otros organismos del sustrato. Su alimentación parece estar relacionada con pequeños organismos o material orgánico disponible sobre la superficie donde viven, aunque todavía se dispone de poca información detallada sobre su dieta y comportamiento alimentario.

Desde el punto de vista evolutivo, los Runcinida son especialmente interesantes por su combinación de características primitivas y especializadas. Su posición dentro de Heterobranchia ha sido objeto de estudios anatómicos y moleculares, que han contribuido a comprender mejor sus relaciones con otros grupos de gasterópodos heterobranquios. Su pequeño tamaño y morfología sencilla muestran cómo diferentes linajes de gasterópodos han evolucionado hacia formas de vida bentónicas muy especializadas.

Aunque los runcínidos rara vez son observados por los buceadores, forman parte de la diversidad poco conocida de los heterobranquios marinos. Su pequeño tamaño, su aspecto discreto y su biología todavía poco estudiada los convierten en un grupo interesante para los estudios taxonómicos y evolutivos. Los muestreos dirigidos, especialmente entre algas y en otros hábitats bentónicos poco profundos, pueden contribuir a mejorar el conocimiento sobre su diversidad y distribución.

La taxonomía de Runcinida según WoRMS es:

Especies de Runcinida citadas en el mar Mediterráneo o en la península Ibérica:

Runcina adriatica

Runcina africana

Runcina avellana

Runcina bahiensis

Runcina brenkoae

Runcina capreensis

Runcina coronata

Runcina ferruginea

Runcina hansbechi

Runcina ornata

Runcina zavodniki

1246567 Runcinida 1 eunomia-revista-en-cultura-de-la-legalidad 50 creator asc 1 7365 https://opistobranquis.info/wp-content/plugins/zotpress/
%7B%22status%22%3A%22success%22%2C%22updateneeded%22%3Afalse%2C%22instance%22%3Afalse%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22request_last%22%3A0%2C%22request_next%22%3A0%2C%22used_cache%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22data%22%3A%5B%7B%22key%22%3A%226KQRBXMG%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A1246567%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Bouchet%20and%20Rocroi%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222005%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A0%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-bib-body%26quot%3B%20style%3D%26quot%3Bline-height%3A%201.35%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3B%5Cn%20%20%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-entry%26quot%3B%26gt%3BBouchet%2C%20P.%2C%20Rocroi%2C%20J.%20P.%20%282005%29.%20Classification%20and%20nomenclator%20of%20gastropod%20families.%20%26lt%3Bi%26gt%3BMalacologia%26lt%3B%5C%2Fi%26gt%3B%2C%20%26lt%3Bi%26gt%3B47%26lt%3B%5C%2Fi%26gt%3B%281-2%29%2C%201-397.%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%5Cn%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22journalArticle%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Classification%20and%20nomenclator%20of%20gastropod%20families%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22P.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Bouchet%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22J.%20P.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Rocroi%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222005%22%2C%22section%22%3A%22%22%2C%22partNumber%22%3A%22%22%2C%22partTitle%22%3A%22%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%22%22%2C%22citationKey%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22%22%2C%22PMID%22%3A%22%22%2C%22PMCID%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%2222WZ5MYR%22%2C%2282T5E3QX%22%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222026-05-14T13%3A36%3A42Z%22%7D%7D%2C%7B%22key%22%3A%22WR37PFVC%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A1246567%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Bouchet%20et%20al.%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222017%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A0%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-bib-body%26quot%3B%20style%3D%26quot%3Bline-height%3A%201.35%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3B%5Cn%20%20%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-entry%26quot%3B%26gt%3BBouchet%2C%20P.%2C%20Rocroi%2C%20J.%20P.%2C%20Hausdorf%2C%20B.%2C%20Kaim%2C%20A.%2C%20Kano%2C%20Y.%2C%20N%26%23xFC%3Btzel%2C%20A.%2C%20Parkhaev%2C%20P.%20et%26%23xA0%3Bal.%20%282017%29.%20Revised%20classification%2C%20nomenclator%20and%20typification%20of%20gastropod%20and%20monoplacophoran%20families.%20%26lt%3Bi%26gt%3BMalacologia%26lt%3B%5C%2Fi%26gt%3B%2C%20%26lt%3Bi%26gt%3B61%26lt%3B%5C%2Fi%26gt%3B%281-2%29%2C%201-526.%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%5Cn%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22journalArticle%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Revised%20classification%2C%20nomenclator%20and%20typification%20of%20gastropod%20and%20monoplacophoran%20families%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22P.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Bouchet%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22J.%20P.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Rocroi%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22B.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Hausdorf%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22A.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Kaim%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Y.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Kano%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22A.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22N%5Cu00fctzel%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22P.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Parkhaev%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22M.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Schr%5Cu00f6dl%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22E.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Strong%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%222%2C604%20names%20at%20the%20rank%20of%20subtribe%2C%20tribe%2C%20subfamily%2C%20family%20and%20superfamily%20have%20been%20proposed%20for%20Recent%20and%20fossil%20gastropods%2C%20and%20another%2035%20for%20monoplacophorans.%20All%20names%20are%20listed%20in%20a%20nomenclator%20giving%20full%20bibliographical%20reference%2C%20date%20of%20publication%2C%20typification%2C%20and%20their%20nomenclatural%20availability%20and%20validity%20under%20the%20International%20Code%20of%20Zoological%20Nomenclature.%20Another%20790%20names%2C%20established%20for%20categories%20above%20the%20familygroup%20%28infraorder%20to%20subclass%29%20are%20listed%20separately.%20A%20fully%20ranked%2C%20hierarchical%20classification%20summarizes%20recent%20advances%20in%20the%20phylogeny%20of%20the%20Gastropoda%20and%20Monoplacophora.%20In%20all%2C%20the%20classification%20recognizes%20as%20valid%20a%20total%20of%20721%20gastropod%20families%2C%20of%20which%20245%20are%20known%20exclusively%20as%20fossils%20and%20476%20occur%20in%20the%20Recent%20with%20or%20without%20a%20fossil%20record%3B%20and%2020%20monoplacophoran%20families%2C%20of%20which%201%20only%20occurs%20as%20Recent.%20Nomenclatural%20acts%20in%20this%20work%3A%20Amberleya%20bathonica%20Cox%20%26amp%3B%20Arkell%2C%201950%2C%20fixed%20as%20type%20species%20of%20Amberleya%20J.%20Morris%20%26amp%3B%20Lycett%2C%201851%2C%20under%20Art.%2070.3%3B%20Ampezzopleura%20tenuis%20N%5Cu00fctzel%2C%201998%2C%20fixed%20as%20type%20species%20of%20Ampezzopleura%20Bandel%2C%201991%2C%20under%20Art.%2070.3%3B%20Proserpina%20nitida%20G.%20B.%20Sowerby%20II%2C%201839%2C%20designated%20type%20species%20of%20Despoena%20Newton%2C%201891%3B%20Buccinum%20glabratum%20Linnaeus%2C%201758%2C%20designated%20type%20species%20of%20Dipsaccus%20H.%20Adams%20%26amp%3B%20A.%20Adams%2C%201853%3B%20Murex%20ficus%20Linnaeus%2C%201758%2C%20designated%20type%20species%20of%20Ficula%20Swainson%2C%201835%3B%20Oncomelania%20hupensis%20Gredler%2C%201881%2C%20designated%20type%20species%20of%20Hemibia%20Heude%2C%201890%3B%20Murex%20metaxa%20Delle%20Chiaje%2C%201828%2C%20fixed%20as%20type%20species%20of%20Metaxia%20Monterosato%2C%201884%20under%20Art.%2070.3%3B%20Neridomus%20anglicus%20Cox%20%26amp%3B%20Arkell%2C%201950%2C%20fixed%20as%20type%20species%20of%20Neridomus%20J.%20Morris%20%26amp%3B%20Lycett%2C%201851%2C%20under%20Art.%2070.3%3B%20Navicella%20clypeolum%20R%5Cu00e9cluz%2C%201843%2C%20designated%20type%20species%20of%20Orthopoma%20Gray%2C%201868%3B%20Trochus%20viadrinus%20M.%20Schmidt%2C%201905%2C%20fixed%20as%20type%20species%20of%20Parataphrus%20Chavan%2C%201954%20under%20Art.%2070.3%3B%20Helix%20pomatia%20Linnaeus%2C%201758%2C%20designated%20type%20species%20of%20Pentataenia%20A.%20Schmidt%2C%201855%3B%20Flammulina%20ponsonbyi%20Suter%2C%201897%2C%20fixed%20as%20type%20species%20of%20Phenacohelix%20Suter%2C%201892%2C%20under%20Art.%2070.3%3B%20Cyrtolites%20corniculum%20Eichwald%2C%201860%2C%20fixed%20as%20type%20species%20of%20Pollicina%20Koken%2C%201895%2C%20under%20Art.%2070.3%3B%20Purpurina%20elegantula%20d%5Cu2019Orbigny%2C%201850%2C%20designated%20as%20type%20species%20of%20Purpurina%20d%5Cu2019Orbigny%2C%201850%2C%20and%20lectotype%20of%20Turbo%20bellona%20d%5Cu2019Orbigny%2C%201850%2C%20designated%20as%20neotype%20of%20Purpurina%20elegantula%3B%20Pyramidella%20minuscula%20Monterosato%2C%201880%2C%20fixed%20as%20type%20species%20of%20Tiberia%20Jeffreys%2C%201884%2C%20under%20Art.%2070.3%3B%20Cyclostoma%20delicatum%20Philippi%2C%201844%2C%20fixed%20as%20type%20species%20of%20Trachysma%20G.%20O.%20Sars%2C%201878%2C%20under%20Art.%2070.3%3B%20Helix%20elegans%20Gmelin%2C%201791%2C%20fixed%20as%20type%20species%20of%20Trochoidea%20T.%20Brown%2C%201827%2C%20under%20Art.%2070.3%3B%20Turritellopsis%20stimpsoni%20Dall%2C%201919%2C%20fixed%20as%20type%20species%20of%20Turritellopsis%20G.%20O.%20Sars%2C%201878%2C%20under%20Art.%2070.3%3B%20Fusus%20averillii%20Gabb%2C%201864%2C%20fixed%20as%20type%20species%20of%20Volutoderma%20Gabb%2C%201876%2C%20under%20Art.%2070.3%3B%20Voluta%20pepo%20Lightfoot%2C%201786%2C%20fixed%20as%20type%20species%20of%20Yetus%20Bowdich%2C%201822.%20Curnonidae%20d%5Cu2019Udekem%20d%5Cu2019Acoz%2C%20nom.%20nov.%2C%20and%20Curnon%20d%5Cu2019Udekem%20d%5Cu2019Acoz%2C%20nom.%20nov.%2C%20are%20established%20for%20Charcotiidae%20Odhner%2C%201926%2C%20and%20Charcotia%20Vayssi%5Cu00e8re%2C%201906%2C%20%28between%2027%20March%20and%201%20May%29%2C%20non%20Charcotia%20Chevreux%2C%201906%20%28January%29%20%5BAmphipoda%5D%3B%20Yuopisthonematidae%20N%5Cu00fctzel%2C%20nom.%20nov.%2C%20and%20Yuopisthonema%20N%5Cu00fctzel%2C%20nom.%20nov.%2C%20are%20established%20for%20Opisthonematidae%20Yu%2C%201976%2C%20and%20Opisthonema%20Yu%2C%201974%2C%20non%20Gill%2C%201862%20%5BPisces%5D.%20The%20new%20family-group%20name%20Burnupiidae%20Albrecht%20is%20established%20in%20this%20work%3B%20and%20the%20names%20Scolodontina%20and%20Orthalicoidei%20are%20first%20used%20here%20to%20denote%2C%20respectively%2C%20a%20suborder%20containing%20the%20family%20Scolodontidae%2C%20and%20an%20infraorder%20containing%20the%20superfamily%20Orthalicoidea.%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222017%22%2C%22section%22%3A%22%22%2C%22partNumber%22%3A%22%22%2C%22partTitle%22%3A%22%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%22%22%2C%22citationKey%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22%22%2C%22PMID%22%3A%22%22%2C%22PMCID%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%2222WZ5MYR%22%2C%2282T5E3QX%22%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222026-07-11T14%3A16%3A03Z%22%7D%7D%2C%7B%22key%22%3A%22X73CNZN8%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A1246567%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22G%5Cu00f6bbeler%20and%20Klussmann-Kolb%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222011%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A0%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-bib-body%26quot%3B%20style%3D%26quot%3Bline-height%3A%201.35%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3B%5Cn%20%20%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-entry%26quot%3B%26gt%3BG%26%23xF6%3Bbbeler%2C%20K.%2C%20Klussmann-Kolb%2C%20A.%20%282011%29.%20Molecular%20phylogeny%20of%20the%20Euthyneura%20%28Mollusca%2C%20Gastropoda%29%20with%20special%20focus%20on%20Opisthobranchia%20as%20a%20framework%20for%20reconstruction%20of%20evolution%20of%20diet.%20%26lt%3Bi%26gt%3BThalassas%26lt%3B%5C%2Fi%26gt%3B%2C%20%26lt%3Bi%26gt%3B27%26lt%3B%5C%2Fi%26gt%3B%282%29%2C%20121-154.%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%5Cn%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22journalArticle%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Molecular%20phylogeny%20of%20the%20Euthyneura%20%28Mollusca%2C%20Gastropoda%29%20with%20special%20focus%20on%20Opisthobranchia%20as%20a%20framework%20for%20reconstruction%20of%20evolution%20of%20diet%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22K.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22G%5Cu00f6bbeler%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22A.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Klussmann-Kolb%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22The%20Opisthobranchia%20comprise%20a%20group%20of%20highly%20specialized%20gastropods%20with%20uncertain%20systematic%20affinities.%20Moreover%2C%20monophyly%20of%20the%20whole%20clade%20has%20been%20repeatedly%20questioned.%20The%20present%20study%20presents%20the%20currently%20most%20extensive%20analyses%20on%20opisthobranch%20phylogeny%20including%2058%20species%20from%20all%20major%20subgroups.%20A%20combination%20of%20four%20gene%20markers%20as%20well%20as%20diverse%20molecular%20systematic%20analytical%20approaches%20are%20applied%20in%20order%20to%20shed%20new%20light%20on%20the%20evolution%20of%20this%20taxon.%20Special%20emphasis%20is%20given%20to%20the%20reconstruction%20of%20ancestral%20diet%20preferences%20since%20extant%20Opisthobranchia%20feed%20on%20a%20variety%20of%20different%20food%20items%20and%20the%20development%20of%20dietary%20specialization%20is%20supposed%20to%20be%20important%20for%20the%20evolution%20of%20these%20enigmatic%20marine%20gastropods.%20Based%20on%20the%20presented%20data%20monophyly%20of%20Opisthobranchia%20is%20clearly%20rejected.%20However%2C%20monophyly%20of%20the%20Euthyneura%20%28comprising%20Opisthobranchia%20and%20Pulmonata%29%20is%20supported.%20Furthermore%2C%20monophyly%20of%20most%20subgroups%20is%20revealed.%20The%20Runcinacea%20are%20found%20as%20a%20separate%20clade%20clustering%20apart%20from%20the%20remaining%20Cephalaspidea%2C%20the%20taxon%20in%20which%20they%20have%20been%20formerly%20classified.%20Furthermore%2C%20Aplysiomorpha%20and%20Pteropoda%20are%20recovered%20as%20a%20monophyletic%20clade%2C%20while%20the%20Aplysiomorpha%20are%20found%20to%20be%20paraphyletic%20due%20to%20the%20position%20of%20a%20single%20taxon.%20In%20addition%2C%20Cylindrobullida%20are%20revealed%20as%20part%20of%20the%20sacoglossan%20subclade%20Oxynoacea%20denying%20their%20current%20separate%20status.%20The%20enigmatic%20Acochlidiacea%20are%20revealed%20as%20sister%20group%20to%20Eupulmonata.%20Ancestral%20diet%20preferences%20are%20reconstructed%20for%20monophyletic%20Euthyneura%20and%20all%20main%20subclades%20since%20polyphyly%20of%20Opisthobranchia%20impeded%20reconstruction%20for%20this%20clade.%20Herbivory%20is%20found%20as%20the%20most%20likely%20ancestral%20diet%20of%20Euthyneura%20while%20carnivory%20probably%20evolved%20several%20times%20independently%20in%20different%20clades.%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222011%22%2C%22section%22%3A%22%22%2C%22partNumber%22%3A%22%22%2C%22partTitle%22%3A%22%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%22%22%2C%22citationKey%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22%3A%5C%2F%5C%2FWOS%3A000291629300009%22%2C%22PMID%22%3A%22%22%2C%22PMCID%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%220212-5919%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%2282T5E3QX%22%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222020-12-19T19%3A35%3A45Z%22%7D%7D%2C%7B%22key%22%3A%22HGKZ2QJG%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A1246567%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22J%5Cu00f6rger%20et%20al.%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222010%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A0%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-bib-body%26quot%3B%20style%3D%26quot%3Bline-height%3A%201.35%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3B%5Cn%20%20%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-entry%26quot%3B%26gt%3BJ%26%23xF6%3Brger%2C%20K.%20M.%2C%20St%26%23xF6%3Bger%2C%20I.%2C%20Kano%2C%20Y.%2C%20Fukuda%2C%20H.%2C%20Knebelsberger%2C%20T.%2C%20Schr%26%23xF6%3Bdl%2C%20M.%20%282010%29.%20On%20the%20origin%20of%20Acochlidia%20and%20other%20enigmatic%20euthyneuran%20gastropods%2C%20with%20implications%20for%20the%20systematics%20of%20Heterobranchia.%20%26lt%3Bi%26gt%3BBMC%20Evolutionary%20Biology%26lt%3B%5C%2Fi%26gt%3B%2C%20%26lt%3Bi%26gt%3B10%26lt%3B%5C%2Fi%26gt%3B%28DOI%3A%2010.1186%5C%2F1471-2148-10-323%29.%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%5Cn%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22journalArticle%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22On%20the%20origin%20of%20Acochlidia%20and%20other%20enigmatic%20euthyneuran%20gastropods%2C%20with%20implications%20for%20the%20systematics%20of%20Heterobranchia%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Katharina%20M.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22J%5Cu00f6rger%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Isabella%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22St%5Cu00f6ger%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Yasunori%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Kano%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Hiroshi%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Fukuda%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Thomas%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Knebelsberger%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Michael%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Schr%5Cu00f6dl%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22Background%3A%20A%20robust%20phylogenetic%20hypothesis%20of%20euthyneuran%20gastropods%2C%20as%20a%20basis%20to%20reconstructing%20their%20evolutionary%20history%2C%20is%20still%20hindered%20by%20several%20groups%20of%20aberrant%2C%20more%20or%20less%20worm-like%20slugs%20with%20unclear%20phylogenetic%20relationships.%20As%20a%20traditional%20%5Cu201corder%5Cu201d%20in%20the%20Opisthobranchia%2C%20the%20Acochlidia%20have%20a%20long%20history%20of%20controversial%20placements%2C%20among%20others%20influenced%20by%20convergent%20adaptation%20to%20the%20mainly%20meiofaunal%20habitats.%20The%20present%20study%20includes%20six%20out%20of%20seven%20acochlidian%20families%20in%20a%20comprehensive%20euthyneuran%20taxon%20sampling%20with%20special%20focus%20on%20minute%2C%20aberrant%20slugs.%20Since%20there%20is%20no%20fossil%20record%20of%20tiny%2C%20shell-less%20gastropods%2C%20a%20molecular%20clock%20was%20used%20to%20estimate%20divergence%20times%20within%20Euthyneura.%20Results%3A%20Our%20multi-locus%20molecular%20study%20confirms%20Acochlidia%20in%20a%20pulmonate%20relationship%2C%20as%20sister%20to%20Eupulmonata.%20Previous%20hypotheses%20of%20opisthobranch%20relations%2C%20or%20of%20a%20common%20origin%20with%20other%20meiofaunal%20Euthyneura%2C%20are%20clearly%20rejected.%20The%20enigmatic%20amphibious%20and%20insectivorous%20Aitengidae%20incerta%20sedis%20clusters%20within%20Acochlidia%2C%20as%20sister%20to%20meiofaunal%20and%20brackish%20Pseudunelidae%20and%20limnic%20Acochlidiidae.%20Euthyneura%2C%20Opisthobranchia%20and%20Pulmonata%20as%20traditionally%20defined%20are%20non-monophyletic.%20A%20relaxed%20molecular%20clock%20approach%20indicates%20a%20late%20Palaeozoic%20diversification%20of%20Euthyneura%20and%20a%20Mesozoic%20origin%20of%20the%20major%20euthyneuran%20diversity%2C%20including%20Acochlidia.%20Conclusions%3A%20The%20present%20study%20shows%20that%20the%20inclusion%20of%20small%2C%20enigmatic%20groups%20is%20necessary%20to%20solve%20deeplevel%20phylogenetic%20relationships%2C%20and%20underlines%20that%20%5Cu201cpulmonate%5Cu201d%20and%20%5Cu201copisthobranch%5Cu201d%20phylogeny%2C%20respectively%2C%20cannot%20be%20solved%20independently%20from%20each%20other.%20Our%20phylogenetic%20hypothesis%20requires%20reinvestigation%20of%20the%20traditional%20classification%20of%20Euthyneura%3A%20morphological%20synapomorphies%20of%20the%20traditionally%20defined%20Pulmonata%20and%20Opisthobranchia%20are%20evaluated%20in%20light%20of%20the%20presented%20phylogeny%2C%20and%20a%20redefinition%20of%20major%20groups%20is%20proposed.%20It%20is%20demonstrated%20that%20the%20invasion%20of%20the%20meiofaunal%20habitat%20has%20occurred%20several%20times%20independently%20in%20various%20euthyneuran%20taxa%2C%20leading%20to%20convergent%20adaptations%20previously%20misinterpreted%20as%20synapomorphies.%20The%20inclusion%20of%20Acochlidia%20extends%20the%20structural%20and%20biological%20diversity%20in%20pulmonates%2C%20presenting%20a%20remarkable%20flexibility%20concerning%20habitat%20choice.%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222010%22%2C%22section%22%3A%22%22%2C%22partNumber%22%3A%22%22%2C%22partTitle%22%3A%22%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%22%22%2C%22citationKey%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22%22%2C%22PMID%22%3A%22%22%2C%22PMCID%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%2282T5E3QX%22%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222026-05-14T13%3A00%3A19Z%22%7D%7D%2C%7B%22key%22%3A%22ZVJH6JKK%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A1246567%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Malaquias%20et%20al.%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222009%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A0%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-bib-body%26quot%3B%20style%3D%26quot%3Bline-height%3A%201.35%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%26quot%3B%26gt%3B%5Cn%20%20%26lt%3Bdiv%20class%3D%26quot%3Bcsl-entry%26quot%3B%26gt%3BMalaquias%2C%20M.%20A.%20E.%2C%20Mackenzie-Dodds%2C%20J.%2C%20Bouchet%2C%20P.%2C%20Gosliner%2C%20T.%20M.%2C%20Reid%2C%20D.%20G.%20%282009%29.%20A%20molecular%20phylogeny%20of%20the%20Cephalaspidea%20sensu%20lato%20%28Gastropoda%3A%20Euthyneura%29%3A%20Architectibranchia%20redefined%20and%20Runcinacea%20reinstated.%20%26lt%3Bi%26gt%3BZoologica%20Scripta%2038%281%29%3A%2023-41%26lt%3B%5C%2Fi%26gt%3B.%20%26lt%3Ba%20class%3D%26%23039%3Bzp-DOIURL%26%23039%3B%20target%3D%26%23039%3B_blank%26%23039%3B%20href%3D%26%23039%3Bhttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.1111%5C%2Fj.1463-6409.2008.00354.x%26%23039%3B%26gt%3Bhttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.1111%5C%2Fj.1463-6409.2008.00354.x%26lt%3B%5C%2Fa%26gt%3B%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%5Cn%26lt%3B%5C%2Fdiv%26gt%3B%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22journalArticle%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22A%20molecular%20phylogeny%20of%20the%20Cephalaspidea%20sensu%20lato%20%28Gastropoda%3A%20Euthyneura%29%3A%20Architectibranchia%20redefined%20and%20Runcinacea%20reinstated.%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22M.A.E.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Malaquias%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22J.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Mackenzie-Dodds%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22P.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Bouchet%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22T.M.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Gosliner%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22D.G.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Reid%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22The%20monophyly%20and%20phylogenetic%20relationships%20of%20the%20Cephalaspidea%20sensu%20lato%20%28sensu%20Burn%20and%20Thompson%201998%29%20have%20been%20investigated%20by%20means%20of%20Bayesian%2C%20parsimony%20and%20distance%20analyses%20of%20nuclear%20%2818S%20rRNA%20and%2028S%20rRNA%29%20and%20mitochondrial%20cytochrome%20oxidase%20I%20%28COI%29%20genes.%5Cn%5CnResults%20revealed%20the%20presence%20of%20three%20monophyletic%20groups%20among%20the%20Cephalaspidea%20s.%20l.%20%28i%29%20Architectibranchia%20%28sensu%20Haszprunar%201985%2C%20in%20part%3A%20including%20Acteonidae%20and%20Aplustridae%2C%20but%20excluding%20Diaphanidae%29%2C%20%28ii%29%20Cephalaspidea%20including%20Diaphanidae%20but%20not%20Runcinidae%20%28both%20previously%20of%20uncertain%20systematic%20affinity%29%2C%20and%20%28iii%29%20Runcinacea.%5Cn%5CnThe%20monophyly%20of%20the%20architectibranch%20families%20Acteonidae%20%28represented%20by%20Acteon%20and%20Pupa%29%20and%20Aplustridae%20%28Hydatina%20and%20Micromelo%29%3B%20of%20the%20runcinacean%20family%20Runcinidae%20%28Runcina%29%3B%20and%20of%20the%20cephalaspidean%20families%20Aglajidae%20%28Chelidonura%2C%20Aglaja%2C%20Odontoglaja%2C%20Navanax%20and%20Philinopsis%29%2C%20Bullidae%20%28Bulla%29%2C%20Gastropteridae%20%28Siphopteron%20and%20Sagaminopteron%29%2C%20Haminoeidae%20%28Atys%2C%20Haminoea%2C%20Phanerophthalmus%20and%20Smaragdinella%2C%20but%20not%20Ventomnestia%29%2C%20and%20Retusidae%20%28Retusa%20and%20Pyrunculus%2C%20but%20not%20Volvulella%29%20is%20suggested.%20The%20families%20Scaphandridae%20%28Scaphander%29%20and%20Rhizoridae%20%28Volvulella%29%20are%20reinstated%20as%20valid.%20A%20new%20phylogenetic%20classification%20of%20the%20Cephalaspidea%20is%20proposed.%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222009%22%2C%22section%22%3A%22%22%2C%22partNumber%22%3A%22%22%2C%22partTitle%22%3A%22%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%2210.1111%5C%2Fj.1463-6409.2008.00354.x%22%2C%22citationKey%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22%22%2C%22PMID%22%3A%22%22%2C%22PMCID%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%2282T5E3QX%22%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222026-05-14T13%3A58%3A20Z%22%7D%7D%5D%7D
Bouchet, P., Rocroi, J. P. (2005). Classification and nomenclator of gastropod families. Malacologia, 47(1-2), 1-397.
Bouchet, P., Rocroi, J. P., Hausdorf, B., Kaim, A., Kano, Y., Nützel, A., Parkhaev, P. et al. (2017). Revised classification, nomenclator and typification of gastropod and monoplacophoran families. Malacologia, 61(1-2), 1-526.
Göbbeler, K., Klussmann-Kolb, A. (2011). Molecular phylogeny of the Euthyneura (Mollusca, Gastropoda) with special focus on Opisthobranchia as a framework for reconstruction of evolution of diet. Thalassas, 27(2), 121-154.
Jörger, K. M., Stöger, I., Kano, Y., Fukuda, H., Knebelsberger, T., Schrödl, M. (2010). On the origin of Acochlidia and other enigmatic euthyneuran gastropods, with implications for the systematics of Heterobranchia. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 10(DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-323).
Malaquias, M. A. E., Mackenzie-Dodds, J., Bouchet, P., Gosliner, T. M., Reid, D. G. (2009). A molecular phylogeny of the Cephalaspidea sensu lato (Gastropoda: Euthyneura): Architectibranchia redefined and Runcinacea reinstated. Zoologica Scripta 38(1): 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.2008.00354.x
Bibliografía basada en los trabajos de Steve Long, 2006. Bibliography of Opisthobranchia 1554-2000 y Gary McDonald, 2009. Bibliographia Nudibranchia, con actualizaciones posteriores procedentes de otras fuentes.