Coloration: Defense strategy

The great diversity of colours and patterns displayed by sea slugs is one of the features that most attracts attention to these animals. From species that are almost invisible against the substrate to others with intense, contrasting colours, colouration can play an important role in their interactions with predators. Depending on the species and its surroundings, it can help an animal remain unnoticed, warn of potential defences or imitate the appearance of other organisms.

Camouflage or crypsis: remaining unnoticed

Many sea slugs have colours and shapes that blend in with the environment in which they live. Some species resemble the algae, sponges or hydroids on which they move or feed. This resemblance, known as cryptic colouration, makes them more difficult for predators to detect. In these cases, concealment depends not only on colour, but also on body shape, texture and the way the animal positions itself on the substrate.

Aposematism: warning colours

Other species display vivid colours, strong contrasts or easily recognisable patterns. This colouration can act as a warning signal, a phenomenon known as aposematism. In certain species, these signals indicate to potential predators that the animal may be toxic, taste unpleasant or possess defensive mechanisms. When a predator learns to associate these colours with an unpleasant experience, it may avoid attacking other animals with a similar appearance.

Mimicry: resembling other organisms

In some cases, a sea slug’s colouration and body shape can make it resemble another organism. This resemblance may help prevent it from being recognised as prey, particularly when it resembles a species that predators avoid.

This phenomenon is known as mimicry, but it should not be confused with camouflage: while camouflage helps an animal blend in with its surroundings, mimicry involves resembling another organism.

Kleptocnidy: making use of prey defences

Some nudibranchs, particularly aeolidaceans, have evolved an extraordinary defensive strategy: kleptocnidy, which involves retaining stinging structures from the organisms they feed on and using them for their own protection.

Many aeolidaceans prey on cnidarians, such as hydroids, which possess nematocysts: microscopic capsules capable of firing a stinging thread. During digestion, some undischarged nematocysts can pass through the branches of the digestive gland and reach the cnidosacs, specialised structures located at the tips of the cerata. There, they are selected and stored in specialised cells called cnidophages, and may retain their stinging capacity.

When the animal is threatened, these retained nematocysts can contribute to its defence. The cerata can act as defensive structures and, in some species, detach from the body through a process known as autotomy. In this way, the nudibranch makes use of part of its prey’s defences rather than relying exclusively on its own defensive mechanisms.

Conclusion

Doridacean and aeolidacean nudibranchs offer particularly interesting examples of this diversity. Among doridaceans, some species display intense, contrasting patterns, while others blend in with the sponges on which they feed. Among aeolidaceans, some species camouflage themselves among the hydroids on which they live, whereas others display highly conspicuous colours.

Ultimately, sea slug colouration does not serve a single function. Camouflage, aposematism, mimicry and the relationship between colouration and defensive mechanisms are different strategies that help explain their extraordinary diversity of colours and patterns.

References

• Dean, L. J., & Prinsep, M. R. (2017). The chemistry and chemical ecology of nudibranchs. Natural Product Reports, 34(12), 1359–1390. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NP00041C
• Haber, M., Cerfeda, S., Carbone, M., Calado, G., Gaspar, H., Neves, R., Maharajan, V., Cimino, G., Gavagnin, M., Ghiselin, M. T., & Mollo, E. (2010). Coloration and defense in the nudibranch gastropod Hypselodoris fontandraui. The Biological Bulletin, 218(2), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1086/BBLv218n2p181
• Rudman, W. B. (1991). Purpose in pattern: The evolution of colour in chromodorid nudibranchs. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 57(Supplement 4), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/57.Supplement_Part_4.5
• van den Berg, C. P., Santon, M., Endler, J. A., Drummond, L., Dawson, B. R., Santiago, C., Weber, N., & Cheney, K. L. (2024). Chemical defences indicate bold colour patterns with reduced variability in aposematic nudibranchs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 291(2027), Article 20240953. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2024.0953
• Winters, A. E., Wilson, N. G., van den Berg, C. P., How, M. J., Endler, J. A., Marshall, N. J., White, A. M., Garson, M. J., & Cheney, K. L. (2018). Toxicity and taste: Unequal chemical defences in a mimicry ring. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1880), Article 20180457. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.0457

Cite this article as: